3-2 in favor of repealing Net Neutrality rules that were put
in place by the United States government in 2015. That decision
has been made official today by being entered into the
Federal Register, and will become law starting April 23,
Following the vote, lawsuits began to appear in efforts to
block the rollback of Net Neutrality, with one
multi-state lawsuit being led by New York Attorney General
Eric Schneiderman and 22 other Attorneys General. As pointed
TechCrunch, now that the Restoring Internet
Freedom order “legally exists,” every opponent in the U.S.,
“from citizens to attorney generals to governors and senators,”
will be able to begin their own lawsuits over the decision.
Prior to today, many actions contemplated and indeed announced
by opponents of the rule were technically not possible, since
the rule was technically not yet in force. A state can’t, for
example, argue that its own laws are infringed upon by a rule
until that rule legally exists.
Today is the moment that the net neutrality repeal legally
exists, and you’re going to see a lot — a lot — of actions
taken against it, all over the country.
The decision was heavily debated leading up to the
vote in December, with proponents arguing the internet will now
go back to a “light-touch regulatory scheme” it faced prior to
2015 and the advent of Net Neutrality. Opponents of the repeal
vocalized fear that internet service providers will now be able
to slow down internet speeds — or block access completely — to
certain websites they see as competitors, among other concerns.
Specifically, the FCC’s vote reclassifies ISPs as “information
service” providers — as they were between February 1996 and
February 2015 — instead of classifying them as “common
carriers” under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934.
According to the Federal Register document published today, the
decision to do this was made to restore broadband internet
services as a “lightly-regulated” market. This means that one
of the only major stipulations placed on ISPs like AT&T and
Comcast is that if they do throttle a user’s internet for any
reason, they must disclose it. For its part, AT&T has said
it is “committed
to an open internet.”
report by Recode in January examined how major
technology companies responded to the Net Neutrality debate,
with Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google spending about $50
million in 2017 lobbying the government on the issue. Apple
alone was said to have spent $7 million on lobbying last year
with a focus on encryption and immigration as well as Net
Neutrality, growing from $4.5 million in 2016.
Apple’s push against the repeal of Net Neutrality included a
letter from August 2017 urging the FCC not to roll back the
rules. Apple’s letter discussed internet “fast lanes” and “slow
lanes,” where paid fast lanes could result in an “internet with
distorted competition.” Apple ultimately said this ruling could
“fundamentally alter the internet as we know it,” and if it
passed it would be put in place to the detriment of consumers,
competition, and innovation.
Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion
regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our
Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site
visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting
is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.